role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
Blog Article
Taking a person’s life is usually a heinous crime that devastates families, communities, and society in general. The harsh punishment serves like a deterrent to likely offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
In accordance with the EPA rate schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and not be intended for redistribution on the internet or for commercial purposes.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified because of the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to the court in which the case is or will be filed.
The mentioned recovery could be used, on the most, for corroboration with the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora read more and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The mentioned memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as nothing was discovered because of such pointation. The place of occurrence together with the place of throwing the dead body were already in the knowledge of witnesses before their pointation because of the petitioners. Reliance is usually placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Please use one particular username and password established from the options. If it does not work please test the other. Each allows single person access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases heard inside the state court, within the same level.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
Knowledge of your accused is actually a matter being inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very difficult to get proved otherwise.”
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment with the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition for the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Development Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) of the Pakistan Constitution provides initial jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had almost nothing to worry about.